Response to my last article: “Loving Darkness”

The man who responds is a dear friend and brother  from “down under”.


Thanks Curtis for this latest article. We have the same cursed influence spreading over here. The Victorian government has mandated that a Safe Schools Program must be taught in all government schools by 2017-18, in order to deal with bullying at school. However the chief designer of this program, Roz Ward, a self pronounced Marxist academic at Melb[ourne] Uni[versity] has publicly stated that this program has nothing to do with bullying, but everything to do with changing society so that the homosexual minority becomes normative. Then another Melb[ourne] Uni[versity] academic wants to see pre-schoolkids being taught the transgender rubbish. Family Voice sent a petition of 14000 signatures to the Commonwealth Government urging them to stop funding this Safe Schools program; the government reviewed the program and has called for some radical changes to it promising to cease funding a little later. [Right, I believe that.]

With a national election for both the lower and upper houses of federal parliament due July 2, [2016], the danger is that Labor may win, & if so, the moral filth out of Labor’s sewers will stink all the more.  We pray the coalition (Liberal & National Party coalition) will be returned to power. There is a significant number of evangelicals in the government & some strong conservatives, who though not Christians, are as forthright for the right things as any Christians are.

[Pray for Australia. Pray for the USA. Let the Church at large repent and confess Jesus as Lord.]

Loving Darkness

((c) The Rev. Dr. Curtis I. Crenshaw, Th.D.)

Two main truths are presented in the following quote: I. There is condemnation; II. Some people practice evil

I. And this is the condemnation,  [two reasons for condemnation] that

(1)        the light has come into the world,

(2) and men loved darkness rather than light,

because their deeds were evil. [reason they love darkness]

II. For everyone practicing evil

                            hates the                             light

and does not come to the   light,

lest his deeds should be exposed. [Reason ungodly hate Christians]

(John 3:19-20 NKJ)

The “light” above is God’s holiness and righteousness. Read also in John 1 John 1:5-2:2) for the same idea.

I heard this on radio recently:

  • In China you can criticize evolution but not the government while here in the USA you can criticize the government but not evolution.

I don’t know which is worse; they are both ungodly tyrannies. Both countries engage in thought control, just as George Orwell predicted of the USA in his prescient novel, 1984. He was only off by a couple of decades.

My two smaller grandkids spent the night last night. My daughter and her husband have turned off their TV at home so the kids wanted to watch cartoons. I thought I would see what they are like. One was all violence, anger, revenge, yelling, screaming, blowing things up. We changed channels, and immediately two teen age cartoon characters were talking about a very racy lesbian scene in a movie they had seen, which was “cool.” I changed channels again. People tell me the comedy shows are just as bad, if not worse so I avoided them.

Next I scanned the menu on my satellite TV, and one program was called “Dating Naked.” My grandson had stepped out of the room, but I thought this surely can’t mean what it says—but it did! I quickly changed channels again before he returned. Finally, we found a nature show, but then there was the ever present evolution, though in this case only mentioned slightly. Whatever happened to the days of good clean cowboy violence, like the Lone Ranger, or Ramar of the Jungle, Tarzan, etc. Those may be on oldie channels if you can find them.

So now back to the “real” world. Could it be any worse? I guess you’ve seen lately that Obama by executive order has mandated that all public schools must honor LGBT people or lose their federal funding. (When will morality become more important than money? At least there are eleven states who are standing up to Obama: UT, AZ, OK, TX, OK, WI, LA, TN, AL, GA, ME. At least five states are in the South.) Obama is bypassing Congress in making laws. More particularly if one “feels” like a girl one day (regardless of the biological plumbing), he is permitted to enter the girl’s restrooms and showers. It is not objective biology that determines one’s gender but how one “feels,” and no one must challenge that or he will be guilty of discrimination. If one does not bow to the golden calf of newspeak, then follow misdemeanors, felonies, or civil fines in the tens of thousands or combinations thereof. Parents will wonder what has happened to their children as they self-destruct against God’s law, and children will murder their parents when they don’t get their way. PARENTS: You must take your kids out of public school and put them in a good Christian school, no matter what the cost is. Their precious souls are at stake. Your children are more important than new homes, new cars, nice clothes.

Christians are being setup as the great scapegoats, those who allegedly hate others (newspeak for holding people to a moral standard). No amount of logic makes any difference when you’re dealing with “feelings,” hate for righteousness, love for sin. If anyone challenges their love for their gods, it is all out media war, throwing bottles of urine and excrement at Christians, wanting to crucify (!) us. BUT in the long run, we Christians win; Satan has never learned that the Church is a gas fire: stomp it and it spreads; leave it alone, and it burns out. We have been somewhat successful in applying the Holy Scriptures to this land, so that we have been left alone, by which I mean, we’ve had few challenges. Now we have sown the wind, we are reaping the whirlwind (Hosea 8:7), and challenges are abounding.

Those who love darkness are becoming increasing irrational, such as the following.

Antony Flew was the leading atheist scholar in England for 50 years against theism. He embraced theism or intelligent design a few years before he died because nothing else explains the design of the universe, the laws of nature, the origin of life itself, our intelligibility,[1] or the delicate balance of nature for us to live on earth. How could something come from nothing; how could life come from lifeless matter, such as molecules in motion; how could consciousness come from raw matter (non-consciousness); how could reason come from non-reason; how could self-conscious thought come from physical objects; how could the consistent laws of science come from random particles; how could persons come from non-persons? The atheist tries to argue that random chance begets intelligence, persons, balance of nature, order, and meaning. In short, chance or chaos gave rise to order. At every point, the atheist is irrational, contradictory, and functions by faith that is irrational, and make no mistake that “irrationality is the prelude to destruction.”[2] John Dryden, the seventeenth century English poet, said:

  • “For those whom God to ruin has design’d,
  • He fits for fate, and first destroys their mind.”

Today we might say it this way: “Those whom God would destroy, He first makes mad.”

We are mad, not legally insane, but mad with rebellion against the Triune God and His character as revealed in His holy law, such as the Ten Commandments. The USA is mad against the Incarnation of the Son of God, against His perfect obedience to His Father, against His death on the cross for our sins, against His bodily resurrection. If it is true that to whom much is given much is required (Luke 12:28), then the USA is in for horrendous judgment. Those prosperity preachers who tell us we can have all the goodies we want if we just magically say the right incantation into the air audibly, will have nothing to say when judgment falls (and it has begun). Make no mistake: turning to darkness or sin darkens one’s reasoning abilities. Reasoning is then only used to support one’s desires, not to determine those desires.

There is only one solution, which the world hates with an unholy passion: repentance from our sins and faith in the Lord Jesus for forgiveness of sins. Anything else is damnation forever. AMEN.


[1] See the excellent work by Antony Flew, the former atheist, There Is A God, published in 2007. Flew announced his change from atheism to theism in 2004, though sadly as far as I know he did not become a Christian before his death on April 8, 2010.

[2] Herbert Schlossberg, Idols for Destruction (Nashville: Thomas Nelson Publishers, 1983), p. 165.

Modern Heresies

In the Reformation of the 1500s, both sides believed the Bible to be God’s infallible word, both held to the Holy Trinity (one God in three equal persons, Father, Son, and Holy Spirit), and both taught that Christ was fully God, perfect man, one person, and no mixture of the natures of deity and humanity so as to dilute them. Today the crisis is worse as even “Christian” people wonder if the Bible is God’s word, if the Trinity is really all that important, and if Christ was only a good man or something less than God. One student at the seminary where I teach said he was summarily dismissed from his position at a “Bible” church because his position on antichrist was “wrong.” I asked him what they asked him about the Trinity, person of Christ, work of Christ, etc., and he said “Nothing!” We live in an age where what one believes about antichrist is more important than what he believes about the Son of God.

There are two ways to be heretical: formally in belief and practically in one’s practice, and our age is given to both.

In formal heresy, there are many in mainline denominations who take delight in denying the historic faith as expressed in such timeless statements as the Apostles’ and Nicene Creeds, which all branches of Christianity have held (Protestant, Orthodoxy (with one adjustment to the Nicene Creed), and Roman Catholic). Modern heresies deny that Christ is the only way to God; indeed, they deny that He is God. They deny the Holy Trinity. They pretend that all religions are the same, which means that none of them mean anything, an insult to all religions that they have no truth claims.

But one can also be heretical in one’s practice, in morality, such as the sexual promiscuity that is rampant today in so many circles. One may be right in his beliefs, but if his morality is contrary to God’s holy commandments, then he/she is heretical:

Now by this we know that we know Him, if we keep His commandments. He who says, “I know Him,” and does not keep His commandments, is a liar, and the truth is not in him. (1 Jn. 2:3-4 NKJ)

Do you not know that the unrighteous will not inherit the kingdom of God? Do not be deceived. Neither fornicators, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor homosexuals1, nor sodomites, 10 nor thieves, nor covetous, nor drunkards, nor revilers, nor extortioners will inherit the kingdom of God.  (1 Cor. 6:9-10 NKJ)

Now the works of the flesh are evident, which are: adultery, fornication, uncleanness, lewdness, 20 idolatry, sorcery, hatred, contentions, jealousies, outbursts of wrath, selfish ambitions, dissensions, heresies, 21 envy, murders, drunkenness, revelries, and the like; of which I tell you beforehand, just as I also told you in time past, that those who practice such things will not inherit the kingdom of God. (Gal. 5:19-21 NKJ)

There is no hope for anyone unless they repent, which means that they confess they are wrong, take God’s view on both belief and practice, and bow to His Lordship. There is not enough room in this universe for two lawgivers: God and man, which is what man wants—his own pretended autonomy.

The serpent’s lie to Adam and Eve was that they could be their own lawgiver, determining for themselves what was right and wrong. We know the consequences when our first parents believed such. Indeed, even in the New Testament many centuries later, God has stated that there is only one lawgiver: the Triune God (James 4:12). He, and He alone, determines what we should believe and what we should practice.

But when our culture dreams up beliefs or ethics out of its mind instead of listening to God, they have created a god after their own image to worship, who, “coincidentally,” will approve their latest fad in unbelief and immoral ethics. The only way one can know anything about God is if He tells us, not when we dream up things that He must allegedly approve. Indeed, the only way we know anyone is by self-revelation.

Was it the great St. Augustine who said that God created man in His own image, and man has been returning the favor ever since? People thousands of years ago made physical idols, and we make mental idols. In both cases, a new god is created after the heart of sinful mankind. Paul the Apostle noted such in his own day in Romans 1:18-25:

18 For the wrath of God is revealed from heaven against all ungodliness and unrighteousness of men, who suppress the truth in unrighteousness, 19 because what may be known of God is manifest in them, for God has shown it to them. 20 For since the creation of the world His invisible attributes are clearly seen, being understood by the things that are made, even His eternal power and Godhead, so that they are without excuse, 21 because, although they knew God, they did not glorify Him as God, nor were thankful, but became futile in their thoughts, and their foolish hearts were darkened. 22 Professing to be wise, they became fools, 23 and changed the glory of the incorruptible God into an image made like corruptible man—and birds and four-footed animals and creeping things. 24 Therefore God also gave them up to uncleanness, in the lusts of their hearts, to dishonor their bodies among themselves, 25 who exchanged the truth of God for the lie, and worshiped and served the creature rather than the Creator, who is blessed forever. Amen.

The great crisis today is Who is God, Who is Christ, and What shall we do with our sins? The Modern answer is that God and Christ are whatever we make them to be, and there is no sin except by OUR definition. Thus, our culture makes Jesus to be a benign and irrelevant weird man who lived two thousand years ago. Today we are being taught not to believe in an objective Triune God but in ourselves. AND likewise we are being taught that we can invent any ethic we wish for our private lives. But in the public arena, the “god” who rules there is the government god: “To hell with Jesus, and all hail to Caesar.”

But as for me and my house, we will serve the LORD (Joshua 24:15).


Trump Trumpets his own Trumpet,  but King Jesus has him Trumped.

Trump Trumpets his own Trumpet, but King Jesus has him Trumped.

(© The Rev. Dr. Curtis I. Crenshaw, Th.D., 7 May 2016)

When Donald Trump first entered the presidential race, I told several friends that he would be a meteor: burn brightly but soon burn out. Most of other 17 men in the GOP race seemed to be fine Christians, perhaps with one or two exceptions. Most of them were men of principle. That the least Christian—if he is Christian at all—is Donald Trump, the man now who is the presumptive nominee for the republican party has been chosen, is a commentary on our culture. Again, the man who has no fixed moral principles, but is a populist (one who favors what the general population wants, not what is morally right), is the one whom it would seem would be the GOP nominee.

And what are the great issues? Are they righteousness, reversing abortion, reclaiming the historic and biblical definition of the family against LGBT (or LGBTQ)? No, the great interests are jobs (a good concern), health insurance (a good concern), immigration (good concern), but no bringing people back to the Triune God. You might say, that is not a politician’s job but the Church’s job. To some extent, I agree, but politicians should make laws that favor God’s righteousness, that make it easy for the Church to evangelize, that encourage preachers, pastors, to give out the Gospel. The First Amendment says “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech. . . .”

That does not mean freedom “from” religion but freedom “for” religion, and in the day that was penned, it meant not to favor one Christian denomination over another one, not that Buddhism should have equal rights with Christianity. Today many want to proclaim that it means freedom “from” religion; indeed, there is even an organization called “The Freedom From Religion Foundation” that tries to shut down any public expression of Christianity. They do not seem to bother other religions. Wonder why? It is because only Christianity threatens the immoral status quo.

If you have not noticed, there is a war going on in our culture, and it is hand-to-hand combat, the devil versus Christ, his demons, minions, and voluntary soldiers of unrighteousness versus the Church, who hate the Triune God and Christians, and who oppose both at every opportunity. We Christians are asleep, full of apathy, and we really only care about ourselves. We will compromise almost anything to keep our toys, our money, our peace, and will only oppose those when they take these things away. We are like the proverbial frog who boiled in the water as it increased degree by degree. He got used to each new temperature.

We do not recognize the Lordship of Jesus, the King of kings and Lord of lords. He rules in the churches, but not in the culture, or so we think. There is even a “Christian” theology that pushes such a view with its rapture doctrine and escapism. “Get me out of here, Lord, there is nothing even You can do!”

Now, as everyone in the republican party gets used to Trump as the presidential nominee, our temperature is rising. Now we have one who will negotiate everything, even abortion, or so he recently said. The temperature goes up. He is willing to consider more debt. The temperature is rising. He says he opposes LGBT, but he implied he might be willing to negotiate even that. WE are at 200 degrees. If he is opposing the Triune God Himself, how is he going to “make America great again”; and if anyone believes that Trump can do that, he is an idolater, for only His sovereign majesty, the King of kings, can make America great again. If anyone looks to Trump as our savior, he blasphemes. The difference between Trump and Obama is one of degree (hot degrees), not kind.

Don Henley, a singer in the UK, has written a good analysis of our cultures and who God is:

  • A new age is dawning
  • On fewer than expected
  • Business as usual
  • That’s how the headline read.
  • Some shaky modern saviors
  • Have now been resurrected
  • In all this excitement
  • You may have been misled.
  • People want a miracle
  • They say oh Lord, can’t you see us?
  • We’re tryin’ to make a livin’ down here
  • And keep the children fed.
  • But, from little dark motel rooms
  • To six flags over Jesus
  • How are the mighty fallen
  • So the Bible said.
  • You don’t have to pray to a little tin god
  • Step out of the way for a little tin god
  • You might fear the reaper, you might fear the rod
  • But you never have to get down on your knees
  • You don’t have to holler, please, please,
  • No, you never have to get down on your knees
  • For a little tin god.
  • Throw down a rope from heaven
  • And lead the flock to water
  • The man in the middle would have you think
  • That you have no other choice.
  • But to wander in the wilderness
  • Of all the upturned faces
  • If you stop and listen long enough
  • You will hear your own small voice.
  • But you don’t have to pray to a little tin god
  • Step out of the way for a little tin god
  • You might fear the reaper, fear the rod
  • But you never have to get down on your knees
  • You don’t have to holler, please, please
  • No, you never have to get down on your knees
  • You don’t have to holler, please, please
  • You never have to get down on your knees
  • For a little tin god.

And yet as I’ve said many times in the past decades, much of the fault can lie at the feet of preachers:

  • An appalling and horrible thing has happened in the land:
  • the prophets prophesy falsely,
  • and the priests rule at their direction;
  • my people love to have it so,
  • but what will you do when the end comes?
  • (Jer. 5:30-31 ESV)

Read all of Jeremiah which reads like it was written last week.

“It is a fearful thing to fall into the hands of the living God.”


Copyright and Evangelism

© Rev. Dr. Curtis I. Crenshaw, Th.D. 2016

What a strange title for a blog article, but it is very pertinent for us today, as I hope to demonstrate.

At present, the world can be divided into three time periods regarding the written word, copyright, and evangelism. The three time periods are (1) from the beginning of mankind and writing to Gutenberg in A.D. 1440-1450;[1] (2) then from the invention of the printing press to today, and (3) today (2016) with eBooks and the Internet, which began in earnest about 1991. Let us consider each of these in order.

First, for thousands of years the only way to preserve ideas was for someone to write them down, sometimes on stone, or vellum (animal skins), or “paper,” which would be papyri hammered into a kind of paper. Before the printing press, professional scribes copied books for the wealthy. Generally, the public could not read well so they rarely had access to good literature. When a catastrophe occurred, such as the huge world-wide library of handwritten manuscripts that burned in Alexandria south of Jerusalem in Egypt, much learning was destroyed. It was most likely set fire around AD 270 or so. This was a loss that set the world back centuries. Now with multiple copies of eBooks all over the world, it is very unlikely that we’ll lose so much knowledge again. Copying manuscripts was slow and inaccurate since the copyists did not copy perfectly. Few people could afford hand copied books. Today we duplicate manuscripts by storing them electronically, and no about of copying these stored manuscripts downgrades their integrity.

Moreover, to send a hand copied manuscript to someone would take considerable time since it had to travel by some kind of animal, personal mail carrier, or boat. For example, if one wanted a copy of the Bible in Greek, it would take a scribe about a year to copy it. If the scribe wanted to maximize his profit, he would in turn hire other scribes, and a reader would call out the text for several scribes to write down at the same time. How would they know that each manuscript was correct? Of course, there were no copyright laws for thousands of years. The idea of intellectual property rights would have been laughable.

But one can see how slow it would be to spread the word of God, or any area of knowledge, by copying text by hand. Of course, no one could copyright a hand copied manuscript.

Second, when Gutenberg invented the printing press, everything changed—everything! Now one could set a Bible to type and not have repeated errors. At this point, textual criticism, that art and science whereby scribes would look at various ancient Greek texts to determine which manuscripts were accurate and which not, essentially took on new dimensions. One could now look at printed books to determine the text, not run all over the world finding Greek manuscripts in hand written form. No one needed to correct manuscripts because the text was now fossilized in printed books. BUT—and this is the important point—now anyone for a moderate price could purchase some books to read. Thus reading became more popular and many were being taught to read. As Erasmus, that great humanist Roman Catholic scholar, who was considered to be the best Greek and Latin scholar of his day by both Catholics and Protestants, said: “When I have money, I buy books. If I have any money left over, I buy food.”

Again, producing books was still relatively expensive, and there were no copyrights. Anyone could print anyone else’s book, undercut the price, and make a few dollars.

The questions now was who was going to control the printing. Of course, kings did not like information disseminated that was not favorable to him. Thus they wanted control over printing, and often assigned printing to someone of the king’s choice. Now he had a monopoly over printing, but could only print what the king approved.

There could have been no Protestant Reformation without Gutenberg. Luther nailed up his 95 Theses on the door of Wittenberg, October 31, 1517, which was the door of a church that served as a community bulletin board for scholars. His theses were written in Latin, and someone took them down, translated them into German, printed them, and distributed them to the people. Thus, the Reformation was born.

Printed books continued to be the blessing of nations for several centuries. In America there was no king to control the printing, no thought police. Books printed in England, and usually with copyright, were reprinted in America at less cost, without copyright. We had no copyright laws until Noah Webster fought for decades not only to recognize intellectual property in America but also to establish international copyright laws. Congress finally passed such laws in the late 19th century. Now copyright laws have to be updated because the form of intellectual property is changing all the time, from printed books to eBooks. Also, Webster started many libraries in various cities of America to make books available to those who could not afford them. Consequently, the literacy of the world was given a huge boost from printed books. Eventually, due to competition and reduction of printing costs, the price of books has really come down since the late 19th and 20th centuries.

Third, we have now entered the information age. When the printing press came along, hand written manuscripts in the great libraries of the world that were not printed were lost. Even today there are scholars who can read those old manuscripts, and they discover manuscripts worth making into books. For example, one of the great Anglican Scholars of the 19th century was J. B. Lightfoot. He had forgotten more Greek and background material to the New Testament that most of us will ever know. In the past year or so, someone discovered more of his work that no one knew about, existing in handwritten manuscripts. These new works are being put into print. Also today, printed books that never become digitized will be lost to the world.

But in the 1960’s and 1970’s some scientists (not former VP Al Gore!) were talking about connecting some computers and having access to everyone’s data on each computer. Then around 1991 the Internet began to take off. Google has caused its growth exponentially with its search engine that can “crawl” the web, find all kinds of data, and make it accessible to all who have a computer and Internet connection.[2] Most searches today use Google’s search engine, (which has only indexed about ten percent of the Internet) though other search engines are available, such as,,, etc. No one really knows how large the Internet is. (Go to and enter a line of your favorite book between quotes; see if it pops up.) Moreover, Google for a couple of decades now has been digitizing whole libraries, most of which are in the public domain so that copyright is not an issue. But they have challenged copyright law. They will digitize a whole book, and if someone finds a quote he likes of a copyrighted work, he can find out from Google where to purchase it. He is not able to see the whole book but only the passage searched for. But anyone can send them his book and ask for it to be scanned and put their book on the web. No one knows how many millions of books Google has scanned. If one has his book in pdf file, he can send that to Google, who will put that eBook on their books site, no scanning necessary, which makes it faster and more accurate.

Now we have books at light speed that one can read, copy parts out, even “borrow” (download the book for, say, two weeks, and then it will erase itself). One can rent, read, and “return” all without leaving his computer. Economically, the price for a book has dropped dramatically over the centuries. Until AD 1450 and Gutenberg, owning “books” would have to be hand written manuscripts. Then printed books were optional for those who could read and had the money, or they could have books read to them. As books were printed and technology improved, the price of books came down. In our day, say from 1900 to today (2016), one could go into most bookstores and purchase a Bible for a few dollars. Now what has happened from 1991 and the Internet to today is beyond imagination. One can send eBooks from one part of the world to another, from Houston, TX to Uganda in a few seconds.

And many of these books are free. An example might help. In 1985 I paid $1,000 for a ten meg hard drive. About two weeks ago I purchased a 5T (five terabytes) hard drive for $153, tax included. The ten meg hard drive cost me $100 per meg. The new drive cost me $0.0000306 per meg. To put this another way, I do not have to keep inventory for any of my eBooks (, will never run out of inventory, because they are stored as electrons. Anyone can order them from anywhere in the world and receive them in a minute or about. Yet I can still copyright them if I wish.

But how does copyright law, the Internet, and evangelism go together? When we first began Cranmer Theological House in September 1994 in Shreveport, all students had to come to our campus. We invited three Ugandan students. We had to pay their airfare to our campus, pay their room and board, any medical problems they had, pay for their tuition and books. Now with the Internet and eBooks, we can hold live classes through Google and YouTube. We can send them eBooks for many of the classes. Thus, while the world sleeps, we can train pastors in Africa, evangelize others in China, and spend next to nothing on materials. We can video our classes and make them available also on YouTube. And we are protected by international copyright law that our materials will not be stolen that we’ve spent years making. We must use the Internet to evangelize Muslim groups like ISIS; they are using the Internet against us.

I can evangelize in my sleep, not have to get an order shipped, but just open my account to see who ordered what. The money is automatically deposited into my account. Of course, we sell printed books also, which are not going anywhere for some decades yet, and those we do have to ship, our buyers are worldwide. It cost me very little to have a web presence for these things. Indeed, some of those who carry my books do so for free, taking a small percentage of the money when orders come in; i.e., Amazon, Barnes and Noble, Google Books, etc. It costs them virtually nothing to list my books and eBooks.

Moreover, we can now send a whole library by fiber optics in a few seconds with 100% accuracy and send it as many times as we wish. There is no delay from idea to writing to print to delivery. There is much time for tyrants to stop the presses, but with the Internet, it is very difficult to control the content or the speedy distribution. One can send eBooks anywhere at light speed. Why are we not doing this to reach the world? A few are. Consider the multiplication factor: I send a book to someone in Canada, having pulled the copyright, who likes it and sends it to his friend in Australia, who knows Mandarin. He then translates it into Mandarin, sends it to his friends in China, who in turn send it to their friends. It goes to Germany in English, is translated into German, then Dutch, etc, You get the picture. This is just not possible with a paper printed book. In theory, all that multiplication could take place in a few days or weeks or months. Can there be a better opportunity?

The printing press made books possible, and everyone wanted his own copy of good books. The manuscripts in the monasteries and ancient libraries that were not printed have basically been lost to mankind, though there are still a few scholars who comb those institutions. Also, those printed books that are not being digitized will be lost to the world. We may think printed books will never vanish, but are you watching the millennials who do everything on a hand held device, including reading books?

No one can now control the content—no king, no group of publishers, no thought police. Each individual, by himself, can write and publish an eBook without censorship and disseminate it to the world. He can copyright it by simply this formula: Name of person who wrote book, date finished, and this symbol: © (Look at my copyright at the top of the first page of this article.) One can send a copy to the Library of Congress if he wishes to have more protection for a written and printed book, but how does one copyright an eBook? Just that way. One does not need a literary agent to copyright his book or get it printed. One writes it, then promotes it through his own web site, blog, or submits it to Amazon or Barnes and Noble. Moreover, there are sites on line that will take your eBook virtually sight unseen.


Thus, for the first time in history, we can evangelize the world from our home offices, and most people in the world either speak or read English. What an opportunity! The copyright would help us stay in business, but of course we give away some of our eBooks, especially those oriented to evangelism or spiritual growth. (See Let us take advantage of this new opportunity the great Lord of the Church has given us!

The Lord of glory said:

“And Jesus came and spoke to them, saying, ‘All authority has been given to Me in heaven and on earth. Go therefore and make disciples of all the nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit, teaching them to observe all things that I have commanded you; and lo, I am with you always, even to the end of the age.” Amen. (Matt. 28:18-20 NKJ)



[1] The Chinese may have predated the West in printing, but that is out of my area.

[2] Some say that there are several aspects to the Internet: the world wide web (WWW), which is a subset of the broad Internet (https://, or http://), the intranet (business), the extranet, and today even the dark Internet that is used by crooks, such as ISIS. Anyone can access to the WWW or http:// versions but the others only with a password.

Our Lion

We’ve all heard the hymn: “My hope is built on nothing less than Jesus’ blood and righteousness”. This time of the year (as well as the whole liturgical year), reminds us of Hebrews 10:9-13:

9 Then He said, “Behold, I have come to do Your will, O God.He takes away the first [covenant] that He may establish the second [covenant]. 10 By that will we have been sanctified through the offering of the body of Jesus Christ once for all. 11 And every priest stands ministering daily and offering repeatedly the same sacrifices, which can never take away sins. 12 But this Man, after He had offered one sacrifice for sins forever, sat down at the right hand of God, 13 from that time waiting till His enemies are made His footstool. 14 For by one offering He has perfected forever those who are being sanctified.”  (Heb. 10:9-14 NKJ)

Some years ago I heard a Roman Catholic Priest from Rome, Italy, testify to a group of Protestant ministers say something like this, after hearing that passage read in their worship service: “If that is in the Bible, we just got put out of business.” Three times Hebrews emphasizes the finality of the death of Jesus. (See the bold print above.)

One of the things that separates us from Rome is these verses from Hebrews 10, where not only the necessity but also the sufficiency of His completed work on the Cross is given. In these trying times, we are tempted to want to bail out of the Christian life. The Middle East is a powder keg, hundreds of thousands of Christians are being murdered, young girls raped to death as their parents are forced to watch, liberalism is destroying our country from the inside as “laws” are passed by the Supreme Court promoting the murder of the unborn (Roe v. Wade in January 1973), the states try to make laws more difficult for the baby killers (and sometimes we win, such as Texas in recent years), Marijuana has become legal, wholesale theft through terrible tax laws and health laws, the Supreme Court continues to destroy the families with its LGBT “laws.” We are tempted to give up, throw up our hands and say something like, “We know things must get worse before the Lord returns.” Really? What do the verses above in quotes say?

The Lion is not defeated but delivers to His Father a conquered kingdom (1 Cor. 15:22-26). The Gospel is not defeated, but heaven and earth belong to Him and us (Matt. 28:18-20). The Lion crushes the head of the serpent and so do we (Rom. 16:20). The Lion rules and so do we (Rev. 2:26-29). We must stop bearing fearful, for the fear of man is a snare; the fear of the Lord is the beginning of wisdom (Prov. 1:7; 29:25). The Lord is getting things arranged, disciplining a recalcitrant Church, so when suffering comes, we’ll win by His sovereign grace, His sovereign Gospel, and His sovereign judgments that He is bringing on the world.

We have victory not only in His “once for all” death on the cross but also in His bodily resurrection (also once for all), and in His ascension and thus enthronement. But also in these dark times of our world, or in these light times of opportunity, we must make Him known. We need to be reminded who rules and why—Jesus rules BECAUSE of His victorious death, punctuated by His bodily resurrection, as His trickle down kingdom has been forming a tsunami through His gospel to envelop the world. He is not the meek, weak, milquetoast kitty cat who meows (click it) and crawls back to his lair with His tail between His legs, but the LION (click it) of the tribe of Judah, who roars with majesty, sovereignty, and power such that the earth trembles under His omnipotent breath. As C. S. Lewis put it, “He is not a tame lion”. Indeed, sir. Let us bow willingly now or by force later to the glory of the Father. The choice is His. Amen.










Outstanding poem, as usual. “My hope is built on nothing less than Jesus’ blood and righteousness”. It is a joy to read your poems, especially this one, that gives us not only the necessity but also the sufficiency of His completed work on the Cross, in His bodily resurrection (also once for all), and His ascension and thus enthronement. In these dark times of our world, or also, in these times light times of opportunity to make Him known, we need to be reminded who rules and why–Jesus rules BECAUSE of His victorious death, punctuated by His bodily resurrection, as His trickle down kingdom forms a tsunami through His gospel to envelop the world. He is not the meek, weak, milquetoast kitty cat who meows and crawls back to his lair with His tail between His legs, but the LION  of the tribe of Judah, who roars with majesty, sovereignty, and power such that the earth trembles under His omnipotent breath. As C. S. Lewis put it, “He is not a tame lion”. Indeed, sir. Let us bow willingly now or by force later to the glory of the Father. The choice is His. Amen.

Gordon J. Wenham, Ph.D., Genesis: 2 Volumes, 1987, 850 pages

(© review by the Rev. Dr. Curtis I. Crenshaw, Th.D.)

Bruce Waltke is my favorite Hebrew scholar, and Wenham is my favorite, conservative Old Testament commentator. His two volumes on Genesis are monumental, stunning, leaving no stone unturned. His 50 page Introduction is worth the price of the first volume.

It is a scholarly work and requires some Hebrew to benefit completely, but even lay people will find help. Somewhat disconcerting we find Wenham introducing JEDP in the Introduction as if it were true or at least helpful, but Wenham seems to attack it in The Face of Old Testament Studies: “Pondering the Pentateuch: The Search for a New Paradigm attacks.” Moreover, Wenham validates how that Genesis attacks the new eastern gods with all their silliness, such as the gods creating mankind so we would feed them, and they would not have to work!

His exegesis verse by verse and insights regarding context, both immediate and throughout the Old Testament, are nothing short of spectacular.

Recommended. AMEN. Ὡ